EPSRC Reference: 
EP/V047604/1 
Title: 
Constructing Counterexamples in Group Rings and Algebraic Topology 
Principal Investigator: 
Craven, Dr DA 
Other Investigators: 

Researcher CoInvestigators: 

Project Partners: 

Department: 
School of Mathematics 
Organisation: 
University of Birmingham 
Scheme: 
Standard Research  NR1 
Starts: 
01 January 2021 
Ends: 
31 December 2022 
Value (£): 
202,256

EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: 

EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: 
No relevance to Underpinning Sectors 


Related Grants: 

Panel History: 

Summary on Grant Application Form 
Groups are the mathematical embodiment of the concept of symmetries of an object, and representation theory studies how these symmetries act on space. The representations of a group are intimately connected to an object known as the group ring. The structure of group rings is fiendishly complicated, but there is one type of group, a socalled torsionfree group, for which the structure is supposed to be simple.
On the other hand, topology aims to understand the broadbrush structure of geometric objects, and algebraic topology applies tools from algebra to this problem. Many conjectures in algebraic topology concern the group ring, and can be related to purely algebraic properties of it.
From around the 1950s, Irving Kaplansky set out a variety of conjectures in ring theory, and three of these  the idempotent conjecture, the zerodivisor conjecture and the unit conjecture  concern the algebraic structure of group rings of torsionfree groups. There is an intricate web of interdependencies between these conjectures and those of algebraic topology, and it leads to a conjecturally very elegant theory for these groups.
However, it seems possible that the theory is not nearly so elegant. The unit conjecture in particular does not have direct topological equivalents. It has also been proved for far fewer classes of groups. Could it be false? Could the other two conjectures also be false?
This project will study the three conjectures, looking for counterexamples rather than to prove the result for a class of groups. It aims to prove indeed that these groups are more complicated than previously thought, and perhaps the theory needs to be reworked.

Key Findings 
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk

Potential use in nonacademic contexts 
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk

Impacts 
Description 
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk 
Summary 

Date Materialised 


Sectors submitted by the Researcher 
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk

Project URL: 

Further Information: 

Organisation Website: 
http://www.bham.ac.uk 