| EPSRC Reference: |
EP/D502551/1 |
| Title: |
Repulsion: The investigation of an organising force in text |
| Principal Investigator: |
Renouf, Professor A |
| Other Investigators: |
|
| Researcher Co-Investigators: |
|
| Project Partners: |
|
| Department: |
Fac of Law Humanities Dev and Society |
| Organisation: |
Birmingham City University |
| Scheme: |
Standard Research (Pre-FEC) |
| Starts: |
01 January 2006 |
Ends: |
31 December 2007 |
Value (£): |
125,855
|
| EPSRC Research Topic Classifications: |
| Human Communication in ICT |
Information & Knowledge Mgmt |
|
| EPSRC Industrial Sector Classifications: |
|
| Related Grants: |
|
| Panel History: |
|
|
Summary on Grant Application Form |
|
The metaphor of 'attraction' from Physics is established in linguistics. It characterises the situation whereby a word is not evenly or randomly distributed across texts, but is found close to its preferred word partners (or 'col locates') in certain textual positions. In our previous work, the focus has been on the circumstances in which words significantly prefer each other's company, whether in adjacent pairings (span of 1 word to the left and right) or discontinuous phrasal or grammatical frameworks (e.g. span of 4 words to the left and right). In the AVIATOR project, we built a'collocational profile' for each word and used statistics to identify the most significant collocates.Now we wish to test the hypothesis that there is another 'force', which we shall call 'repulsion', that operates on the construction of text in the opposite way. By repulsion, we mean the system of conventional language use which discourages certain pairs of words from occurring together; for instance, it is possible in English to say 'Happy Christmas', 'Merry Christmas' and 'Happy Birthday', but not 'Merry Birthday'. The goal of the study is to look at the reasons behind these and more complex examples; to establish whether and how consistently the force operates, and whether it holds two words at a measurable distance from each other.Absence of attraction is not the same as repulsion. We wish to establish a measure to differentiate between the non-cooccurrence of two words simply because they have no particular association, and actual repulsion. We are interested in discovering repulsion not just where it can be expected (e.g. where conventional rules apply), but where it is a surprise; where all things being equal, attraction might be expected (e.g. 'Happy' and 'Merry' are fairly close synonyms, so we might have expected both of them to be attracted by 'Birthday').This project will reveal facts about an unexplored but fundamental and potentially exploitable aspect of language in use, and the results will be important to whatever extent the hypothesis proves true. The IT applications for this new measure will complement and supplement the use of collocation measures. While collocation can indicate which word is the normal (correct) choice for a given context, 'repulsion' will pick up on unusual (incorrect) choices of words, serving as a tool to identify errors and evaluate suggested choices in drafts by writers of text and international users of English.
|
|
Key Findings |
|
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk
|
|
Potential use in non-academic contexts |
|
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk
|
|
Impacts |
|
| Description |
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk |
| Summary |
|
| Date Materialised |
|
|
|
|
Sectors submitted by the Researcher |
|
This information can now be found on Gateway to Research (GtR) http://gtr.rcuk.ac.uk
|
| Project URL: |
|
| Further Information: |
|
| Organisation Website: |
http://www.bcu.ac.uk |